Now reading Entry 022 / 102 Last revised Jan 22, 2026 20 sources 2 comparisons Methodology →
A specimen of the Cognitive drawer Drawer E · Cognitive

DSIP

Research Only

A nonapeptide discovered in 1977 that was initially thought to induce delta wave sleep. Research has shown broader neuromodulatory effects including stress-protection and analgesia, though its role as an endogenous sleep factor remains controversial.

Delta Sleep Inducing Peptide · Delta Sleep-Inducing Peptide · WAGGDASGE

Research evidence
Moderate

7 human studies

Preclinical
65%
Clinical
35%

Based on 20 cited sources

Evidence Score52/100
Early / limited
Research Depth57/100
Mechanism43/100
Plausibility62/100
Global Coverage48/100
Community Experience47/100
Effectiveness38/100

clinically demonstrated · low confidence

Demonstrated effect magnitude — not a recommendation or safety claim.

Research Depth 57 (1A 24: multiple small double-blind placebo-controlled human insomnia trials, all from one Swiss group [Schneider-Helmert/ Schoenenberger 6689058, 3622582, 3792404, 7028502], each n<50, controlled- clinical-trial grade not independent parallel RCTs; 1B 10: double-blind but small/single-group/high inter-individual variability, "some concerns"; 1C 5: total human N ~50-100; 1D 11: direct population/outcome for insomnia, IV route; 1E 7: substantial preclinical program across antioxidant/hypoxia/ cold-stress/antinociception/neuroendocrine models). Mechanism 43 (2A 10: no validated DSIP receptor, target inferred, endogeneity itself disputed, serotonergic/opioid roles shown only via antagonist blockade of downstream systems [methysergide 6132892, naloxone 2853064]; 2B 12: proximal signaling partially known; 2C 12: dose-dependent antinociception + parabolic dose- response across models in vivo; 2D 9: confirmed in mammalian in vivo). Plausibility 62 (3A 22: mechanism->sleep-surrogate established with human outcome data but >=1 unproven receptor link; 3B 20: coherent with serotonergic sleep biology; 3C 12: mixed-to-supportive class analogy from serotonergic/sleep neuropeptides; 3D 8: moderately broad multi-system claim set [sleep+stress+analgesia+neuroendocrine]). Global Coverage 48 (4A 18: human sleep work single Swiss group, preclinical replicated by independent Russian/Japanese/Israeli groups; 4B 16: 4+ countries; 4C 14: ~few dozen studies, diverse contexts but research largely abandoned post-1990s; 4D 0: no regulatory approval anywhere). Community Experience 47 (5A 14: niche but persistent sleep-optimization use; 5B 16: multi-year track record; 5C 8: reports inconsistent across users with tolerance + vivid dreams noted; 5D 9: no serious adverse signal, isolated minor reports). Effectiveness basis clinical (low confidence): placebo-controlled double-blind trials show sleep normalization rather than sedation on functional sleep endpoints, but effect is modest, highly variable, surrogate/functional, single-group, old, with no head-to-head and no large modern trials.

Scored June 2026 How we rate →
~
Evidence Level
moderate
Not approved for human use by any regulatory agency
Limited human clinical trial data
Consult a healthcare provider before use
Not FDA Approved WADA Prohibited
Identity
SCALE · 1:1 N-TERMINUS C-TERMINUS 9 AA · 848.8 Da
Also Known As
Delta Sleep Inducing Peptide • Delta Sleep-Inducing Peptide • WAGGDASGE
Class
Nonapeptide
Length
9 amino acids
Mol. weight
848.8 Da
Sequence
WAGGDASGE
Molecular Structure
W
A
G
G
D
A
S
G
E
Hydrophobic
Polar
Positive
Negative

The proposed mechanisms of DSIP are based on a mix of human studies from the 1980s and animal research. The peptide’s exact receptor target remains unidentified, and whether it truly exists as an endogenous compound is still debated.

How It Works (Simplified)

DSIP appears to act as a neuromodulator through several interconnected pathways:

Sleep Normalization

Modulates serotonergic neurotransmission to promote natural sleep patterns rather than acting as a sedative. Effects most pronounced in sleep-disturbed individuals.

Stress Protection

Activates antioxidant enzymes (SOD, catalase) and stabilizes cell membranes, reducing oxidative damage under various stress conditions.

Pain Modulation

In animal studies, centrally administered DSIP produced antinociception that was reversed by naloxone, indicating involvement of the endogenous opioid system. No human pain data exist.

Neuroendocrine Effects

Influences cortisol, growth hormone, and other hormones that affect sleep-wake cycles and stress responses.

Key Research: Yehuda & Mostofsky (1982) found that DSIP-induced sleep signs were blocked by the serotonin antagonist methysergide, implicating serotonergic mediation. PMID:6132892

Important Limitations

  • No specific DSIP receptor has been identified
  • Whether DSIP exists endogenously remains controversial (Kovalzon 2006)
  • Most studies are from 1980s-1990s with outdated methodology
  • High inter-individual variability in response rates
  • Blood-brain barrier penetration mechanism unclear
  • Research largely abandoned after 1990s in favor of newer sleep medications
i. Serotonergic Pathway · Sleep Modulation
DSIP5-HT system modulationAltered sleep architectureDelta wave enhancement (proposed)
ii. Antioxidant Pathway · Stress Protection
DSIPMembrane stabilizationReduced lipid peroxidationSOD/Catalase activationCellular stress protection
Mechanism Serotonergic system modulation affecting sleep-wake neurotransmission
Supported 4 direct studies
Benefit may normalize disrupted sleep patterns
Evidence Level
Low
3 Human
4 Animal
1 In Vitro
Mechanism Antioxidant enzyme activation (SOD, catalase) with membrane stabilization
Supported 5 direct studies
Benefit appears to protect against stress-induced cellular damage
Evidence Level
Low
6 Animal
2 In Vitro
Mechanism Endogenous opioid system involvement (naloxone-reversible antinociception)
Emerging 1 direct study
Benefit suggested to reduce pain perception
Evidence Level
Very Low
1 Animal
Mechanism Neuroendocrine modulation affecting cortisol and growth hormone rhythms
Emerging 3 direct studies
Benefit may regulate stress hormone responses
Evidence Level
Very Low
3 Animal
Mechanism Confidence
Established
Supported
Emerging
Evidence Level
High
Moderate
Low
Very Low

Reported positives

  • Improved sleep onset and quality reported
  • Reduced stress and anxiety noted
  • Natural-feeling sleep enhancement cited
  • Well-tolerated with minimal morning grogginess

Reported negatives

  • Effects inconsistent across users
  • Tolerance develops with regular use
  • Limited suppliers and quality control concerns
  • Some users report vivid or disturbing dreams

“Niche following in sleep optimization community. Often discussed alongside melatonin and sleep peptides.”

Self-reported, unverified accounts — not clinical evidence and no substitute for the cited research. Anecdotes are prone to selection bias and placebo effects.

NCT ID Title Peptide Phase Status Completion
Historical
Swiss clinical studies in insomnia (1980s)
DSIP Phase Early clinical Completed -
Historical
Russian clinical investigations (1980s-1990s)
DSIP Phase Clinical research Completed -
Historical Completed

Swiss clinical studies in insomnia (1980s)

DSIP Phase Early clinical Est. -
Historical Completed

Russian clinical investigations (1980s-1990s)

DSIP Phase Clinical research Est. -
Phase 01 1
Week 1-2

Based on early human studies: Initial effects on sleep architecture may begin. Some users report improved sleep quality within days. High variability in response noted across studies.

PMID:7028502
Phase 02 2
Week 2-4

Human studies showed continued improvement in sleep-disturbed individuals. The 'normalizing' rather than sedating effect becomes more apparent. Stress-protective benefits may emerge based on preclinical data.

PMID:6391925
Phase 03 3
Week 4-8

Swiss follow-up studies reported that sleep normalization was maintained through a one-week follow-up period in some patients. Response variability remains high.

PMID:3792404
Phase 04 4
Week 8+

Long-term human data is limited; published trials extended only to short follow-up periods of about one week. Optimal treatment duration is unknown, and no controlled long-term studies are available.

Research-based observations

This timeline reflects observations from published clinical and preclinical studies. Individual responses may vary significantly. This is not a guarantee of effects or a dosing schedule. Consult qualified healthcare providers for personalized guidance.

Good Signs (6 indicators)
White to off-white lyophilized powder (cake or crystalline appearance)
Dissolves completely and quickly in bacteriostatic water
Clear, colorless solution after reconstitution
Comes with certificate of analysis (COA) showing >98% purity
Third-party HPLC and mass spectrometry verification available
Proper vacuum seal on vial before reconstitution
Warning Signs (5 indicators)
Slightly off-white or cream-colored powder (may still be acceptable)
Takes longer than expected to fully dissolve
Powder appears collapsed or melted (possible moisture exposure)
COA from manufacturer only without third-party verification
Purity listed below 98% but above 95%
Bad Signs (6 indicators)
Yellow, brown, or otherwise discolored powder
Visible particles or cloudiness after reconstitution
Gel-like consistency or clumping that won't dissolve
No COA provided or COA appears fraudulent
Strong unusual odor
Vial seal appears compromised or previously opened
Positive quality indicator
Requires evaluation
Potential quality issue

For Research Evaluation Only

These quality indicators are general guidelines based on typical peptide characteristics. Professional laboratory testing (HPLC, mass spectrometry) provides definitive quality verification. This checklist is for initial visual evaluation only.

Synergistic
Compatible
Caution
Avoid

Both are neuropeptides with anxiolytic and stress-protective properties. Selank is better characterized with more consistent research. No interaction studies available.

Semax

Compatible
Compatible

Non-overlapping primary mechanisms. DSIP focuses on sleep/stress while Semax is primarily nootropic. Theoretical complementary benefits for cognitive recovery.

Epithalon targets telomerase and circadian regulation while DSIP affects sleep architecture. Both may influence circadian rhythms through different pathways.

Both affect sleep-wake cycles. Combining sleep-modulating compounds may have unpredictable effects. Monitor for excessive sedation if used together.

Research Note: Interaction data is based on published literature, mechanistic understanding, and theoretical considerations. Most peptide combinations lack direct clinical study. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare providers.

This dossier synthesizes available evidence from peer-reviewed literature, regulatory documents, and clinical trial registries. Evidence strength ratings follow a modified GRADE approach.

For complete methodology details, see our Methodology page.

Important Disclaimer

This dossier is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before making health decisions.

Get Research Alerts

New dossiers and major study summaries delivered to your inbox. Evidence-graded, citation-backed research you can trust.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare DSIP

Related Peptides

Cognitive

Alixorexton

ALKS 2680 · ALKS-2680

An oral orexin receptor 2 (OX2R) agonist developed by Alkermes for narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). Phase 2 clinical trials demonstrated improvements in excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy with once-daily dosing. Represents a novel approach to restore orexin signaling in patients who have lost orexin-producing neurons.

See dossier
Cognitive

Cerebrolysin

FPF-1070 · N-PEP-12 · Renacenz

Cerebrolysin is a porcine brain-derived peptide mixture approved in 50+ countries for stroke, dementia, and traumatic brain injury. It is NOT FDA-approved in the United States despite decades of international clinical use. Contains neurotrophic peptide fragments mimicking BDNF, GDNF, NGF, and CNTF. Mixed Phase 3 results but positive meta-analyses and widespread adoption in Europe, Asia, and Latin America.

See dossier
Cognitive

Cerluten

Brain cytamin · Cerebral peptides · A-5 brain peptides

A cytamin-class peptide supplement derived from brain tissue, part of the Russian bioregulator framework. Marketed as an oral supplement for cognitive support and neuroprotection. Contains peptide complexes rather than defined sequences. No Western clinical validation.

See dossier
Cognitive

Cortexin

Cortexinum · Polypeptide brain extract · Bovine brain cortex polypeptides

A Russian neuropeptide complex derived from porcine or bovine cerebral cortex, approved in Russia and CIS countries for neurological conditions. Contains low molecular weight polypeptides (1,000-10,000 Da) with proposed neurotrophic and neuroprotective properties. NOT approved by FDA, EMA, or other Western regulatory agencies. Evidence comes primarily from Russian studies with limited Western validation.

See dossier
Cognitive

Dihexa

PNB-0408 · N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6) aminohexanoic amide

An angiotensin IV analog developed by Washington State University researchers, claimed to enhance cognition through HGF/c-Met signaling. Gained attention for extreme potency claims (10 million times more potent than BDNF), but evidence is limited to rodent studies from a single research group with no human clinical trials. Sold as a research chemical with unknown safety profile.

See dossier
Cognitive

N-Acetyl Selank Amidate

NA-Selank · N-Acetyl Selank · Acetyl-Selank-Amidate +1

A modified version of Selank with N-terminal acetylation and C-terminal amidation designed to enhance stability and bioavailability. While the parent compound Selank is approved in Russia, N-Acetyl Selank Amidate has no independent clinical research and relies entirely on extrapolated claims from Selank studies.

See dossier

Related Content