Longevity Comparison

MOTS-c vs SHLP-2

MOTS-c has human endogenous-peptide observations and a native Phase 2 registration without outcomes; SHLP-2 has receptor and metabolic model findings with no established human treatment effect.

Last updated: September 28, 2026

Dossier labels summarize each dossier's research scope. They do not establish comparative treatment benefit or safety. Read the comparison below in that context.

MOTS-c

Dossier overview

Low Evidence
View full dossier

SHLP-2

Dossier overview

Low Evidence
View full dossier

Research comparison

MOTS-c is a 16-residue mitochondrial peptide whose original study examined metabolism and AMPK-related signaling in cells and mice. SHLP-2 is a humanin-like peptide from the mitochondrial 16S region; its model research has investigated cytoprotection and energy regulation. These are different sequences, not interchangeable formulations. MOTS-c discovery, PMID 25738459 · SHLP-2 receptor study, PMID 37468558

QuestionMOTS-cSHLP-2
Human evidence citedFour endogenous biomarker/physiology papers; one registered native intervention with no cited resultA naturally occurring SHLP-2 K4R variant was associated with lower Parkinson disease risk; no demonstrated administered-peptide benefit (PMID 38167865)
Mechanistic evidenceMouse metabolic and physical-capacity studiesCXCR7-mediated hypothalamic signaling in experimental models
Therapeutic-claim gradeLowLow for human benefit

Human MOTS-c studies measured circulating peptide in sleep apnea, diabetes and exercise settings, while administration experiments were in mice. The 2026 physiology study did not find an exercise-related human arterio-venous difference. A 2026 C26 mouse/cell cachexia paper reported partial muscle preservation with preventive exposure, without preserving overall body or fat mass; it is not a human outcome. PMID 40538389 · PMID 40855115 · PMID 41520850 · PMID 42266945

SHLP-2’s 2023 CXCR7 study is a model mechanism. A separate primary study reported that the naturally occurring mitochondrial m.2158 T>C variant, which produces K4R SHLP-2, was associated with lower Parkinson disease risk; its cell and mouse experiments tested mechanisms, not human SHLP-2 treatment. Genotype association is not an administered-peptide result and cannot establish that giving SHLP-2 improves metabolism, protects cells clinically or extends life. CXCR7 model, PMID 37468558 · K4R association, PMID 38167865

NCT07505745 is a native MOTS-c Phase 2 registration with no cited efficacy result. The completed CB4211 registration concerns an analog. Neither record supplies a SHLP-2 or MOTS-c-plus-SHLP-2 outcome.

FDA reports insufficient safety information for compounded MOTS-c products; no combination-safety inference follows from mitochondrial origin. FDA compounding safety review

This selected-source comparison is educational, not use guidance.

Stay Updated on Peptide Comparisons

Get notified when we publish new comparison dossiers and evidence reviews.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Disclaimer: This comparison is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Individual responses to medications vary. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before making treatment decisions.