Longevity Comparison

Epithalon vs Sigumir

Comparison of Epithalon (Low evidence) and Sigumir (Low evidence).

Last updated: February 12, 2026

Dossier labels summarize each dossier's research scope. They do not establish comparative treatment benefit or safety. Read the comparison below in that context.

Epithalon

Dossier overview

Low Evidence
View full dossier

Sigumir

Dossier overview

Low Evidence
View full dossier

Overview

Epithalon and Sigumir are both studied in the peptide research space.

Epithalon: A synthetic tetrapeptide (Ala-Glu-Asp-Gly) developed by Russian scientist Vladimir Khavinson, claimed to activate telomerase and extend lifespan.

Sigumir: A cytamin-class peptide supplement derived from cartilage tissue, part of the Russian bioregulator framework.

Evidence Comparison

AspectEpithalonSigumir
Evidence LevelLowLow
Human Studies51
Preclinical Studies155
Total Sources287

Key Differences

AspectEpithalonSigumir
CategoryLongevityRepair & Recovery
Evidence StrengthLowLow
Total Sources287
Human Studies51

Summary

  • Epithalon: Low evidence with 28 total sources (5 human)
  • Sigumir: Low evidence with 7 total sources (1 human)

This comparison is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any decisions about peptide use.

Stay Updated on Peptide Comparisons

Get notified when we publish new comparison dossiers and evidence reviews.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Disclaimer: This comparison is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Individual responses to medications vary. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before making treatment decisions.